A couple days ago, I was asked to write a piece for a pretty major website on Kathryn Bigelow's Oscar win.
I was flattered to be asked, and although I didn't have time to do it AT ALL... I did it anyway.
Which involved recruiting one of the assistants here at Lie to Me to do off-the-books research, writing two sentences at a time between meetings and phone calls, and then a plowing through a rushed re-write at midnight when I finally got home.
Sadly, but not shockingly, when I turned it in, they didn't love it. They wanted something more fact-based and less anecdote-y. It was, they said correctly, too "bloggy."
Fortunately, in a crazy, strange, twist of fate, I HAVE A BLOG!!! So, I'm posting it here. Because I like it. And I can. So here goes:
.
Frankly, I’m a little annoyed by Kathryn Bigelow’s Oscar
win.
I’ll tell you why in a minute, but first I have to tell
you a story. It goes like this:
Ten years ago, my writing partner, Elizabeth Craft, and
I wrote an Oz spec script. We were just beginning our career as
television writers, and we knew we needed a writing sample that would show
prospective employers (men) that we weren’t too soft. Too female.
Soft and female, we understood intuitively, would not
serve us well.
And we were right.
That Oz spec, with its copious
amounts of anal rape and random acts of violence, got us our first primetime
job. Eventually, it got us our
dream job, on The Shield, where we
stayed for three seasons. (And
where, on our first day of work, we made sure to use the F-word in the writers’
room, so all the male writers would know we nice, Midwestern girls could hang.)
Strategically, writing an Oz spec was the right thing to do. (And it wasn’t just strategy— we really loved Oz.) That script kick-started what has, so far, been a pretty
great career.
But here’s the problem: we also had a terrific Once
& Again spec. Probably
better than the Oz. Did that spec get the same kind of
heat?
Nope. Not
remotely.
Sadly, when it came to getting hired, our Once & Again script was, in the
words of our agent, “sprayed with man-off.” It was useless in this town.
My annoyance at Kathryn Bigelow’s Oscar win is rooted in
the man-off conundrum, which is basically this: to garner attention and respect, women in Hollywood have to
act like/write like/direct like men.
Is this an absolute rule? No. (And by no,
I mean pretty much yes, unless you’re Nancy Meyers, and even that’s debatable.)
Just to be clear, I’m not saying that Bigelow didn’t deserve her Oscar— she certainly
did. So did Randa Haines, who
wasn’t even nominated for Children of a
Lesser God in 1986, despite the movie’s nomination for Best Picture. And so did Niki Caro, whose 2002 film Whale Rider is still one of the most
stunning pieces of artistic achievement I’ve ever seen.
A Beautiful Mind
won that year. A lovely movie,
sure.
But Whale Rider was
better.
And don’t even get me started on how Barbra Streisand wasn’t
nominated for Yentl in 1983. Seriously. I can’t talk about it. (But it has to be said—was there ever a movie more sprayed with man-off?)
For my money, the closest a woman’s come to winning a Best
Director Oscar is Jane Campion in 1993— but her film, The Piano, was up against Schindler’s
List, and no one in the universe was going to win against that juggernaut.
In the last eighty-two years, in fact, only four women have
even been nominated in the Best Director category: Bigelow, Jane Campion, Sophia Coppola, and Lina
Wertmuller. That’s four in
eighty-two years. Lemme just
say that again.
Four in eighty-two
years.
Eighty-two years is a long time. And four is a really small number.
So forgive me for not dancing on the glass ceiling.
Because as much as I want to believe that Barbra
Streisand was referring to some grand, universal shift when she opened that
crisp, ivory envelope and intoned, “Well… the time has come,” really she just
meant that on this one night, the time has come for this one woman. And that’s great. Truly, madly, deeply great.
But it doesn’t mean that sexism in Hollywood is
dead.
It’s not even resting.
Not when what it took for a female director to finally be
taken Academy-Award-Winning-Seriously was a film about men engaged in the most manly of pursuits—by which, of
course, I mean war. The Hurt Locker is all testosterone, all
the time, and while it’s a stunning movie, I’m not convinced it would have been
nominated if it hadn’t been directed
by a woman. The novelty alone gave
it a level of attention that other women directors simply don’t get.
(Quick aside: When it comes to attention, it’s not just
in the movie industry that women writers and directors get the short end. As recent articles in The New York Times and Women & Hollywood have noted, female
playwrights and novelists don’t fare much better.)
What, after all, is the source of this attention deficit? Why is man-off spray so powerful? Most importantly, does the fact that my
agent even thought of such a concept
mean that I should fire him? (Just
kidding, Matt. Relax.)
It’s actually quite simple. And by simple, I mean extraordinarily complex and probably
impossible to solve. But it comes
down to something in this arena: as a culture we don’t value stories about
women as much as we value stories about men. We don’t value women’s voices as much as we value men’s
voices. And until we do, it won’t
really matter who’s directing, or who’s writing, or whether the person taking
home the award is wearing pants or a dress.
And if saying that makes me sexist… well, I live in
Hollywood.
I fit right in.
.
Thanks to Melissa Silverstein at Women & Hollywood for reminding me
of the wonder that is Whale Rider,
and to Heather Thomason for the fast, well-honed research.
Recent Comments